PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
WGS vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

WGS vs. ^GSPC

Last updated May 10, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and S&P 500 (^GSPC).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WGS or ^GSPC.

Correlation

The correlation between WGS and ^GSPC is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

WGS vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

WGS:

1.70

^GSPC:

0.44

Sortino Ratio

WGS:

2.69

^GSPC:

0.79

Omega Ratio

WGS:

1.37

^GSPC:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

WGS:

2.11

^GSPC:

0.48

Martin Ratio

WGS:

13.87

^GSPC:

1.85

Ulcer Index

WGS:

14.89%

^GSPC:

4.92%

Daily Std Dev

WGS:

114.04%

^GSPC:

19.37%

Max Drawdown

WGS:

-99.85%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

WGS:

-93.06%

^GSPC:

-7.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGS achieves a -23.05% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's -3.77% return.

WGS

YTD

-23.05%

1M

-39.21%

6M

-23.98%

1Y

191.04%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

-3.77%

1M

3.72%

6M

-5.60%

1Y

8.55%

5Y*

14.11%

10Y*

10.45%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

WGS vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WGS is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WGS is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WGS is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WGS is 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WGS is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WGS is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

WGS vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current WGS Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGS and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Drawdowns

WGS vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGS and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

WGS vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...